<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Adam Jury &#187; Productivity &amp; Pant Rocking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://adamjury.com/category/productivity-pant-rocking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://adamjury.com</link>
	<description>Adam Jury on: Gaming • Apple • Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 08:49:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Instant Messaging Efficiency</title>
		<link>http://adamjury.com/2009/instant-messaging-efficiency/</link>
		<comments>http://adamjury.com/2009/instant-messaging-efficiency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Productivity &#38; Pant Rocking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamjury.com/?p=221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dan Benjamin at Hivelogic wrote a nice article about effectively using your &#8220;Away&#8221; message when instant messaging.
Here&#8217;s two other things that I think is necessary for efficient IM communications
Ask Your Question, Don&#8217;t Ask to Ask
Don&#8217;t say hello and wait for someone to respond; just ask your question. Don&#8217;t ever say &#8220;Hey, are you there?&#8221; or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan Benjamin at Hivelogic wrote a <a href="http://hivelogic.com/articles/view/sending-a-message/">nice article about effectively using your &#8220;Away&#8221; message when instant messaging</a>.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s two other things that I think is necessary for efficient IM communications</p>
<h3>Ask Your Question, Don&#8217;t Ask to Ask</h3>
<p>Don&#8217;t say hello and wait for someone to respond; just ask your question. Don&#8217;t ever say &#8220;Hey, are you there?&#8221; or &#8220;Hey, can I ask you a question?&#8221; &#8212; just ask it.</p>
<p><strong>Situation 1:</strong></p>
<p>Bob: Hey Adam?<br />
[time lapse of 2 hours]<br />
Adam: Sorry, what did you want?<br />
[Bob is now AFK, time lapse of another hour.]<br />
Bob: Hey, I was wondering how big the Gear chapter was?<br />
Adam: It&#8217;s 62 pages. [Total time lapse of 3 hours]</p>
<p><strong>Situation 2:</strong></p>
<p>Bob: Hey Adam, I need to know how big the gear chapter is.<br />
[time lapse of 2 hours]<br />
Adam: It&#8217;s 62 pages. [No matter how long the time lapse is here before Bob reads my IM, I've fulfilled my commitment.]</p>
<p><strong>Situation 2</strong> is far preferable. If you know that the person isn&#8217;t available, you may be better off sending an email or posting to whatever project management software you use &#8212; but simply saying &#8220;hello&#8221; does not get work finished, no matter what communications tool you&#8217;re using.</p>
<h3>Use Auto-Away Sparingly</h3>
<p>Some IM clients will set you as &#8220;automatically away&#8221; if you are idle for more than a certain period of user-definable time. In practice, I think this feature doesn&#8217;t work, especially when the time is set low, as the defaults often are. I notice that a lot of people, even when they&#8217;re working or otherwise busy, will notice that their IM client has set them to auto-away and instantly fiddle with their IM client to reset their status to Available &#8212; resulting in the user &#8220;bouncing&#8221; around their friend&#8217;s buddy lists.</p>
<p>If you want to use auto-away, I suggest setting it to a high value: at least an hour. That way it will work for you when you&#8217;ve been caught up in a long phone call or you fell asleep or got kidnapped by friends [or aliens!], but it won&#8217;t get triggered when you&#8217;re simply busy working.</p>
<h3>Turn Your IM Client Off</h3>
<p>I should probably do this more, at least with my business-related accounts: if you&#8217;re going to be unavailable on IM for a period of time that is extreme [such as an entire daytime period during your co-worker's workday] &#8212; turn your IM client right off. Seeing things like &#8220;(1d) Away&#8221; in my buddy list just frustrates me, like those people are wasting my screen real estate. I sort these people into a custom group, &#8220;Idlers,&#8221; and minimize that group so I never see them unless I&#8217;m specifically looking for them.</p>
<p>&copy;2010 <a href="http://adamjury.com">Adam Jury</a>. All Rights Reserved.</p>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://adamjury.com/2009/instant-messaging-efficiency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OmniFocus</title>
		<link>http://adamjury.com/2007/omnifocus/</link>
		<comments>http://adamjury.com/2007/omnifocus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 03:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apples are Delicious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Productivity &#38; Pant Rocking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamjury.com/2007/omnifocus/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m dorking around with OmniFocus, a new GTD [Getting Things Done] app. Seems pretty slick so far! I&#8217;ve found that GTD has yet to survive the extreme time crunches I get into sometimes, but there&#8217;s always room to improve productivity.
&#169;2010 Adam Jury. All Rights Reserved..]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m dorking around with <a href="http://www.omnigroup.com/applications/omnifocus/">OmniFocus</a>, a new GTD [Getting Things Done] app. Seems pretty slick so far! I&#8217;ve found that GTD has yet to survive the extreme time crunches I get into sometimes, but there&#8217;s always room to improve productivity.</p>
<p>&copy;2010 <a href="http://adamjury.com">Adam Jury</a>. All Rights Reserved.</p>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://adamjury.com/2007/omnifocus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RSB on Recently Viewed Mail Smart Folders</title>
		<link>http://adamjury.com/2007/rsb-on-recently-viewed-mail-smart-folders/</link>
		<comments>http://adamjury.com/2007/rsb-on-recently-viewed-mail-smart-folders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 06:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apples are Delicious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Productivity &#38; Pant Rocking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamjury.com/?p=38</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Daniel at Red Sweater Blog wrote an interesting post about using Mail&#8217;s Smart Folders to create a Recently Viewed Mail Smart Folder &#8212; seems like a pretty keen tip to me.
I&#8217;m giving it a try, and in addition to his Recently Viewed parameters, I&#8217;m also excluding it from a few mail folders that I&#8217;m unlikely [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel at <a href="http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/">Red Sweater Blog</a> wrote an interesting post about using Mail&#8217;s Smart Folders to create a <a href="http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/275/mail-smart-folders">Recently Viewed Mail Smart Folder</a> &#8212; seems like a pretty keen tip to me.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m giving it a try, and in addition to his Recently Viewed parameters, I&#8217;m also excluding it from a few mail folders that I&#8217;m unlikely to refer to as often, such as the folder where &#8220;Someone has replied to your topic/blog entry/etc&#8221; mail goes, and some mailing list folders.</p>
<p>Depending on how you filter and store email, that might not be necessary &#8212; or it might be easier to tell it to only look for Recently Viewed mail in certain folders, as opposed to <b>not</b> in certain folders.</p>
<p>&copy;2010 <a href="http://adamjury.com">Adam Jury</a>. All Rights Reserved.</p>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://adamjury.com/2007/rsb-on-recently-viewed-mail-smart-folders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows for the Future</title>
		<link>http://adamjury.com/2007/windows-for-the-future/</link>
		<comments>http://adamjury.com/2007/windows-for-the-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 06:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Productivity &#38; Pant Rocking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamjury.com/?p=35</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a Windows machine sitting on the other side of my room, safely segregated from my working desk. I use it for work purposes occasionally: to deal with legacy files and to test stuff in IE, plus I play a few games now and then, and I prefer to keep them compartmentalized away from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Windows machine sitting on the other side of my room, safely segregated from my working desk. I use it for work purposes occasionally: to deal with legacy files and to test stuff in IE, plus I play a few games now and then, and I prefer to keep them compartmentalized away from my work machines. Sometimes I use VNC to connect to it so I can play online poker from my Powerbook</p>
<p>Before I started using Macs &#8212; and, really, before I started using OS X &#8212; I think I actually enjoyed fooling around with Windows, to a degree. There used to be some level of fun in installing new video drivers to make performance just a little bit better, and in running all sorts of little applications to tweak my computer. Once I learned that doing stuff <i>with</i> the computer was cooler than doing stuff <i>to</i> the computer, I began to resent the never-ending stream of maintenance that Windows seems to require: relatively frequent security updates, virus scans [and updating the software and definitions], spyware scans [and updating there, too], defragging, and as many hardcore users will say, a full reinstall roughly every year.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have time for that. More importantly, I don&#8217;t want to spend that much time doing &#8220;work&#8221; to maintain a computer that doesn&#8217;t do much work for me &#8212; time I spend twizzling with Windows is time I can&#8217;t spend on something more profitable, constructive, or <b>fun.</b></p>
<p>I bought the current Windows machine [a HP, it has an AMD processor, some RAM, and perhaps a very small donkey inside] in late 2004. I&#8217;ve been faithfully upgrading my virus scanner, my adware scanner, and I defrag it on a regular basis. I&#8217;m such a good little babysitter. I&#8217;ve never had a virus on that machine, never had &#8220;adware&#8221; more intrusive than a cookie, and all in all, the machine is still pretty stable [although slower than it used to be ... something about "using it" that seems to make it slower.]</p>
<p>As of now, though, I&#8217;m stopping. I&#8217;ve set the virus scanner to run once a month, and to check for updates on the same schedule. I&#8217;m not going to run spyware scanning software out of habit anymore &#8212; only if I suspect Windows has become crudded up. I&#8217;ll upgrade the software firewall if it stops working for some reason or if I run into some sort of incompatibility, but I&#8217;m not going to touch it otherwise. Defragging? No. Scandisk? Only if I have reason to suspect the hard drive is failing. Windows Updates? Once a month, no more. I&#8217;ve turned off auto-updating in Firefox &#8212; the version I have works, and I have extensions installed that work. I&#8217;ll update them once a month if there are updates available. I am not even bothering to check if I <i>could</i> install Vista on it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to set this up on a schedule: first Saturday of every month is &#8220;the day I am allowed to spend an hour &#8212; maybe two &#8212; dorking with Windows.&#8221;</p>
<p>At some point during the year I&#8217;m going to transfer as much of possible of the actual data on the drive onto an external drive, and back static data up onto DVDs. I&#8217;ll keep the external drive powered off unless I&#8217;m actively using it.</p>
<p>With minimal babysitting and sane browsing habits, I think there&#8217;s a fine chance of the computer staying relatively clean and useful for another year or two. At that point, it can go in the garbage and be replaced &#8212; or not &#8212; and I&#8217;ll feel fine about discarding something that I have so little investment in, and no valuable data on.</p>
<p>&copy;2010 <a href="http://adamjury.com">Adam Jury</a>. All Rights Reserved.</p>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://adamjury.com/2007/windows-for-the-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Super-fast Mail Act-On</title>
		<link>http://adamjury.com/2006/super-fast-mail-act-on/</link>
		<comments>http://adamjury.com/2006/super-fast-mail-act-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 07:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apples are Delicious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Productivity &#38; Pant Rocking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamjury.com/?p=32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you use Mail Act-On to apply filters to your mail within Apple&#8217;s Mail.app, and you use one of your rules much more than any other, here&#8217;s a quick tip: assign the trigger key to the same key you use to invoke Mail Act-On. A quick double-tap of your chosen key can file mail 1.8 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you use <a href="http://www.indev.ca/MailActOn.html">Mail Act-On</a> to apply filters to your mail within Apple&#8217;s Mail.app, and you use one of your rules much more than any other, here&#8217;s a quick tip: assign the trigger key to the same key you use to invoke Mail Act-On. A quick double-tap of your chosen key can file mail 1.8 times faster than conventional Mail Act-On methods!</p>
<p><span class="technoratitag">Technorati Tags: <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tags/mail.app" rel="tag">mail.app</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/apple+mail" rel="tag">apple mail</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/email" rel="tag">email</a></span></p>
<p>&copy;2010 <a href="http://adamjury.com">Adam Jury</a>. All Rights Reserved.</p>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://adamjury.com/2006/super-fast-mail-act-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
